About Us
|
Contact Us
|
Site Map
Search:
DOP Services
Rules
Forms
Publications
Pay Ranges
Job Classes
Appeals & Reviews
Appeals and Director's Review
Classification
Compensation Benefits and Hours
Competencies
Consulting Services
Diversity and Equal Opportunity
Employee Assistance Program
Employee Recognition
Guidance, Tools, Samples & Resources
HR Information and News
Information Systems
Layoff
Meetings
Personnel Reform
Reasonable Accommodation
Essential Functions
Reasonable Accommodation Guide
Resources
Significant Cases
Recruitment and Assessment
Rules, Laws, & Regulations
Training & Development
Workforce Planning
Home
>
HR Professionals
>
Reasonable Accommodation
>
Significant Cases
Significant Cases
Washington State Disability Law: Significant Cases
COURT
CASE
IMPORTANT POINTS
WA State Supreme Court
Dean v. Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle-Metro,
104 Wn.2d 627, P.2d 393 (1985).
To prove discrimination based on a failure to accommodate, an employee must first prove that: 1) He/she was qualified to fill the vacant positions; and 2) The employer failed to take affirmative measures to make known job opportunities to the employee and to determine whether employee was in fact qualified for such positions.
Metro failed to reasonably accommodate the employee where it treated him as any other applicant, did not determine the extent of his disability, did not call him into the office to assist him in applying for other positions, and failed to take affirmative steps to help him find another position.
WA State Supreme Court
Clark v. Shoreline School Dist.,
106 Wn.2d 102, 720 P.2d 869 (9
th
Cir. 1989)
Employer need not provide accommodation requested.
Employer is required to transfer employee to an alternative position if such a position exists and employee is qualified to perform it.
9
th
Circuit Court of Appeals -
applying WA State law